« Art Leonard: Some thoughts about the California Marriage Case | Main | Same-Sex Marriage and Racial Justice Find Common Ground »

Friday, May 16, 2008

Commentary: A band of gold

Link: Salon
by Sara Miles

Excerpt:

Reuters/Phil McCarten

imageA wedding cake is displayed at a demonstration celebrating the California Supreme Court's decision overturning a ban on same-sex marriages held in West Hollywood, Calif., on May 15. (Reuters/Phil McCarten)

 

I never bothered taking off the ring.

A little over four years ago, I swung by a jeweler and bought a $40 gold band, rushing to an event I'd never expected would happen -- my wedding. Martha and I, who had been together for 11 years then, were married, with our daughter as witness, at San Francisco's City Hall, in the great Valentine's Day uprising of affirmative civil disobedience.

Along with 4,000 other couples, we received what many of us hadn't known we were looking for: legal families, a laundry list of new rights and obligations, and the teary, cheering welcome of our fellow citizens.

Strangers kissed us and thrust carnations into our arms. A little girl, on the steps of City Hall, shyly gave my bride a handwritten note, in pink magic marker, reading "Congratulations on your marriage." My mother was so happy she almost wept when I called her with the news. My sister yelped with joy. My brother's voice cracked. "Oh, Sara," he said. Then, "I guess we're gonna have to buy you a kitchen appliance, now that you're legal."

But our next-door neighbor, Isabel, who was 6, looked confused when her parents ran into our backyard whooping congratulations. "I thought Sara and Martha were married," she said.

[...]

The law is not always an instrument of sufficient subtlety to be capable of codifying the truth, not to mention common sense. Just a few months after the San Francisco weddings, the courts pronounced all 4,000 marriages unlawful, "void from inception," and they were annulled with a wave of the judicial hand. I fell back on Isabel's interpretation: We were married. I had a spasm of rage at the injustice of it all, but I continued to introduce Martha as my wife -- even though, in a fairly kinky turn of events, she was now, officially, also my ex-wife.

So I'm very happy about Thursday's California Supreme Court ruling that all citizens, without exception, share the right to marry and be part of an "officially recognized and protected family." But it's hard to summon up too much excitement about remarrying -- especially as the court decision could itself be invalidated in November. Conservatives have gathered more that a million signatures for a ballot measure that would amend the California constitution to make same-sex marriages illegal. I'm not sure I can stand to have my marriage to my wife annulled one more time.

For now, I'm just going to keep wearing the ring.

[jw]

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1134879/29165648

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Commentary: A band of gold:

Browse Categories

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Google


  • WWW
    samesexmarriage

Sponsors

  • Although all work in designing this blog and posting excerpts to it is done by volunteers, there are costs involved in the running and monitoring of the site.

    Two organizations have been particularly generous in this regard--The Freedom to Marry and The Legal Marriage Alliance of Washington.

    Please check out their sites and become a member so they can continue to support other efforts such as this one.

Freedom to Marry

  • All across the country, in every state, in many families, citizens are talking honestly and thoughtfully about whether and how to recognize a life commitment made by two women or two men in love. Americans are trying to find their way to understanding that our nation is currently a quilt of many different types of families, each of them working hard to live their lives, raise their children and contribute to the growth and security of their communities.

    At Freedom to Marry, you will find a library of information to help you engage in this national conversation. Make yourself at home and understand why we must fight to end discrimination in marriage and why marriage should be legal for same-sex couples. Also, find out how you can Get Informed, Get Involved and Carry the Conversation Forward by sharing what you learn with your own family and community.

    How can you add your voice to this conversation? Click Here

The Legal Marriage Alliance of Washington

  • The Legal Marriage Alliance of Washington (LMA) was created in October 1995 to advocate for legal marriages for same-sex couples in the State of Washington. We have been very much involved in the history of the marriage equality issue in our state and continue to participate openly and actively in the public arena wherever this issue is raised. LMA's function is primarily educational, although we work closely with other community groups on political and other activities associated with our cause. LMA is well versed in the issues and can be a good resource for reporters and others who are researching marriage equality issues in depth.

Copyright notice

  • Copyright Notice
    © 2008, To Form a More Perfect Union: Marriage Equality News

Site Meter

Google Analytics

  • Google Analytics